|
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
International Resolution of the Green Party of the United States, Opposing U.S. Intervention in Cuba December 2003 Drafted by the International Committee Adopted by the Coordinating Committee December 7, 2003 |
|
| PEACE BETWEEN THE PEOPLES OF CUBA AND THE UNITED STATES The Green Party of the United States hereby declares its strong desire for peaceful relations with the people of Cuba, and greater interchange between our two nations. We call on the U.S. Congress to enact a joint resolution lifting the U.S. embargo and restoring all normal diplomatic relations, and we call for a U.S. pledge not to use military force or political and economic subversion against the Republic of Cuba. HOSTILE U.S. RHETORIC IS A STEP BACK TO THE COLD WAR As Greens we are committed to non-violence, democracy, and social justice. Like others in the Americas, we are alarmed by the Cold War-era rhetoric of the U.S. administration. In recent months U.S. officials have said that Iraq was "a very good example for Cuba," and accused Cuba of developing bio-weapons which might be shared with terrorists. This claim has been emphatically denied by the Cuban government. While military intervention in Cuba could be expensive and dangerous for Bush, both militarily and politically, we can expect continued disinformation about weapons of mass destruction, and continued anti-Cuba rhetoric from this administration. The official U.S. military policy remains a doctrine of pre-emptive force and subversion, against "rogue states". Thus we are concerned, just as the people of the Caribbean region are concerned, that U.S. policy toward Cuba, during the "War on Terror," could take a turn for the worse at any time. We are also disappointed by the Bush Administration's recent, clumsy attempts to stiffen travel restrictions on U.S. citizens visiting Cuba, thousands of whom are in Cuba each year for study, civil sector assistance, the arts, and trade. We call on our fellow citizens and their organizations to likewise oppose tightened Cuban travel and pledge to continue opposition until the ban is lifted. CUBAN ACTIONS CAN ALSO THREATEN BETTER RELATIONS As Greens, however, we deplore executions, whether state-ordered killings are used against common criminals, or political dissidents. The tragic execution in April 2003 of three hijackers in Cuba impels us to even more committed action against the death penalty, both here in the US and in Cuba. This Cuban government action was used by Cuba's enemies to advocate extreme U.S. action. The Global Greens Charter, adopted by more than 70 national Green parties in 2001 -- including the Green Party of the United States -- condemns capital punishment and demands its worldwide abolition. THE DIFFICULT RECENT HISTORY OF U.S.-CUBAN RELATIONS Relations between Cuba and the U.S., in years after the Revolution of 1959, were characterized by U.S.-initiated military attacks, bombings, contamination of crops, and hundreds of attempted assassinations. Mutual hostility once brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. More recently, conflicts surrounding the ongoing U.S. embargo, the Mariel boatlift, overflights by Cuban expatriates, disagreements over migrant exit and entry policies, and the Elian Gonzalez incident, have kept U.S.-Cuban relations tense and hostile. At the same time, even the U.S. Congress has grown weary of U.S. policy. For three years in a row the House of Representatives voted to end the travel ban on Cuba -- most recently this past September 9, by a vote of 227-188. On October 23 the U.S. Senate adopted the same policy, by a vote of 59-36. Yet public opinion in the U.S. is divided, with 50% or more in recent surveys supporting continued U.S. hostility, and retention of the embargo. In the spring of 2003 things got worse, following the execution of the hijackers by the Cuban government, and the trial and imprisonment of 75 Cubans convicted of subversion -- for accepting $20 million in U.S. aid. |
The entire region is affected. Other countries in the Caribbean -- all of whom have voted in the United Nations to condemn the U.S. embargo -- fear the implications of U.S. diplomatic, economic, and military pressure on Cuba -- easily imagining this pressure directed at their own nations. |