INCREASE GUN CONTROL,ONLY THE FOOD INDUSTRY SHOULD CARRY GUNS TO HUNT ANIMALS FOR NON PROFESSIONAL

I BELEIVE THAT FOOD INDUSTRY ARE REALLY THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT SHOULD CARRY GUNS IF THEY PASS CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS.FOR NON PROFESSIONAL.PROFESSIONAL WOULD INCLUDE THE LAW AND SECURITY.TO HUNT AMINALS AND TO CREATE JOBS TO HUNT ANIMALS IN THE USA AND AROUND THE WORLD.GUN CONTROL FOR THE FOOD INDUSTRY ONLY IN THE USA.IT WOULD DECREASE GUN VIOLENCE IN THE USA AND CREATE JOBS.


Showing 7 reactions

  • commented 2016-01-20 09:04:38 -0800
    Gun control in the United States and elsewhere has historically been used as a method of disenfranchising minorities. So long as the government remains armed in the form of police and military forces, disarming the people serves only to widen the gap between the rulers and the ruled.
  • tagged this with not important 2016-01-20 09:04:38 -0800
  • commented 2016-01-01 18:52:44 -0800
    If we address the systemic and social sources of violence, it will not be necessary to try to take away people’s guns. Moreover, with current technology, it is simply unenforceable. You can print a gun in your garage nowadays.
  • tagged this with not important 2016-01-01 18:52:44 -0800
  • commented 2015-12-26 11:48:23 -0800
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Finland
    Check all the citations on this page, hunting is not the issue in terms of gun violence between humans.
  • tagged this with not important 2015-12-26 11:48:22 -0800
  • published this page in 2016_strategy2 2015-12-24 12:42:03 -0800